European Tribune

Display:
Oh come on, even in places where population growth has gotten under control, like in China, people leave farming for industry. It might be awful, but it's still less awful than the life of the romanticised third world farmer.

We can also look back at our own history. In 19th century Europe people left the countryside en masse for the horrible industrial cities, because the cities were less horrible than the alternative.

And eventually, things got better.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Mon Jul 21st, 2008 at 10:31:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Those that left the countryside en masse during the 19th century were not the subsistence farmers, but their domestics and various hired hands. Much of the rural exodus was actually a redistribution from small scale, decentralised artisans to large scale industries, too.

Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Mon Jul 21st, 2008 at 10:48:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Still more projection on your part.

What's meant by "romanticising" the third world farmer, and who do you believe is doing it?

The C18 Agricultural Revolution began in England, where the move to the cities was not a flight of peasants from the land that they were desperate to get away from, but a result of the Enclosures, which destroyed by privatisation the previous mode of agricultural production.

The idea that "things got better" when heaps of people were living in exploited filth in C19 industrial cities, compared to rural poverty, is so potty I think you're just trying to stir it up. Right?

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Jul 21st, 2008 at 11:40:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's hard to tell objective benefits of leaving farming for industry, or taking other such "best" choices. What people do is they follow each other: they solve their hardships by looking at apparently successful decisions, or where everyone is moving. What else would you know?

And then there is the promise of opportunity. Capitalism is indeed good in providing great opportunities, to relatively few eventually. People apparently like to make a lottery choice, even with substantial life-size risks.  Concentrating on success stories while ignoring silent evidence of loosers is one of those logical fallacies that Taleb talks in "The Black Swan".

by das monde on Mon Jul 21st, 2008 at 10:17:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series