European Tribune

Display:
Initial reports seem to have been misleading. The story now is that the fault was in a heating element designed to prevent ice buildup on the engine turbines. The determination was made that in summer weather the risk of ice buildup was minimal and the plane is able to fly with that element disabled for 10 days according to the maintenance manual. The fault is believed to not be related to the crash. Also, reports that the engine caught fire on takeoff and caused the crash are incorrect according to a video taken by AENA, the airport operator. Instead, the plane passes the point of no return but fails to attain enough lift and crashes, bouncing several times before catching fire. (sources: El Pais, including this editorial demanding an end to wild speculation)

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 22nd, 2008 at 03:18:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The story now is ...

They can't possibly know the triggering event at this stage of the investigation, way too early.  

I presume they've collected the 'Black Box' Flight Data Recorder and are doing preliminary analysis of the information.  However, that only gives the data the avionic system was passing around and what the pilot, co-pilot, and flight engineer were seeing/saying.  

Important Point: the FDR does not give the actual state and condition of the mechanics of the airplane but only what the avionics thought their condition was.  That thermometer was doing what a thermometer does: record temperature.  WHAT was causing the temperature rise will not be known until the US NSTB and Spanish authorities reassemble the bits and pieces of the plane and conduct a visual inspection and analysis.  

A doo run-run-run, a doo run-run

by ATinNM on Sun Aug 24th, 2008 at 12:57:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series