However, your pardoning is undermined when you note that I "pile on the topic..". Maybe that has a different connotation for you, but I understand it to mean that I press an unfair advantage to give an undeserved kicking. Not quite the same as introducing the "note of sanity", is it ? So you do feel I am demonstrating anti-French bias.
As I said, there's nothing I can do about that, but it's disappointing to say the least.
Would you prefer that I say that the Brussels/Strasburg axis makes excellent sense, that what was true in the 70s remains true now ? When it is so blatantly untrue and the situation is absurd ?
But I can see your so sensitized to the subject that we are unable to discuss it reasonably here, so I'll withdraw. keep to the Fen Causeway
The French barely bother to defend Strasbourg's role, in general. It's the Germans who are the most attached to Strasbourg.
The constant harping on this topic (like the same harping on a caricatured version of expenses) is just anti-European (waste, bureaucracy, corruption, bla, bla, bla). I don't know that it is anti-French, although it might be that too. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
